It is important for anyone constructing an argument or formulating any substantial though in written form to differentiate between subjective viewpoints and objective ones. Knowing the exact situation when to use an objective type of reasoning is imperative for any writer or scholar, along with the capacity to not mix subjective thinking when writing any material that is intended to hold an unbiased viewpoint.
Both objective arguments and subjective ones are useful when writing specific arguments, yet sometimes unexperienced writers end up confusing them, resulting in biased and bewildering writings.
It may not seem intuitive for most, but knowing when to use one or the other is bound to help any writer increase his / hers creative clarity , and why not, their persuasive writing style.
As a rule, subjective information is bound to reflect be a single person’s opinion, along with that person’s bias and viewpoint. At no point should a subjective viewpoint be considered an absolute truth, regardless of the information it provides, as long as it is unsubstantiated. You see, subjective information usually contains judgments, assumptions, rumors, suspicions, and of course, personal beliefs.
Objective information, on the other hand, is completely unbiased and can be easily verified with sources. When writing objective arguments, one must always appear to be outside of the actual information, presenting it as absolute truth without taking any stance whatsoever. It goes without saying that objective writing should contain no personal feelings on the matter being presented, under any circumstances.
Therefore, subjective information can hold different parameters when different people are inquired, whereas objective information will usually be as close to the truth as possible.
Furthermore, objective information will usually contain the same specifics, while subjective information will mostly be based on assumptions, personal beliefs, judgment, suspicions, urban legends, fabricated yet circulated fabrications, and rumors.
Subjective and Objective arguments in everyday life
In order to figure out when exactly should we use either objective or subjective arguments in daily life, we should look no further than newspapers and encyclopedias.
While journalists will often present personal beliefs as facts, they are just as often based on words of mouth, anecdotes, or personal experiences that at the end of the day, hold no substantiated truth whatsoever.
With manuals, encyclopedias, or any other form of written source of knowledge, you can most of the time be certain that a fair amount of research has gone into writing said materials, thus being as close to the absolute truth as humanly possible.
Although sometimes subjective viewpoints do get lost among the seemingly well-researched texts of manuals or encyclopedias, it is fair to assume that a majority of all the information presented within such texts is objective and unbiased.
All things considered, one should always remember that objective reasoning is at the core of all scientific research, while subjective ideas represent the basis of all forms of small talk and general conversation.
As a writer, however, one should always be able to differentiate objective arguments from subjective ones, seeing how writers are sometimes required to present from different viewpoints or none viewpoints whatsoever.